4.6 Article

The triple threat to nascent apolipoprotein B - Evidence for multiple, distinct degradative pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 30, 页码 27855-27863

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M008885200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58541, HL38956, HL58884, T32-HL07824, HL22263] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50376] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously showed that Omega -3 fatty acids reduce secretion of apolipoprotein B (apoB) from cultured hepatocytes by stimulating post-translational degradation. In this report, we now characterize this process, particularly in regard to the two known processes that degrade newly synthesized apoB, endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation and re-uptake from the cell surface. First, we found that Omega -3-induced degradation preferentially reduces the secretion of large, assembled apoB-lipoprotein particles, and apoB polypeptide length is not a determinant. Second, based on several experimental approaches, ER-associated degradation is not involved. Third, re-uptake, the only process known to destroy fully assembled nascent lipoproteins, was clearly active in primary hepatocytes, but Omega -3-induced degradation of apoB continued even when re-uptake was blocked. Cell fractionation showed that Omega -3 fatty acids induced a striking loss of apoB(100) from the Golgi, while sparing apoB(100) in the ER, indicating a post-ER process. To determine the signaling involved, we used wortmannin, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, which blocked most, if not all, of the Omega -3 fatty acid effect. Therefore, nascent apoB is subject to ER-associated degradation, re-uptake, and a third distinct degradative pathway that appears to target lipoproteins after considerable assembly and involves a post-ER compartment and PI3K signaling. Physiologic, pathophysiologic, and pharmacologic regulation of net apoB secretion may involve alterations in any of these three degradative steps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据