4.5 Review

Mice with targeted mutations of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors: Models for depression and anxiety?

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 811-825

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00518-2

关键词

depression; anxiety; animal models; gene targeting; transgenic mice; glucocorticoid receptor; mineralocorticoid receptor; transcription factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impaired corticosteroid receptor signaling is a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of stress-related psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. Since in vivo expression and functional studies of corticosteroid receptors are not feasible in the human central nervous system, such analyses have to be done in animal models. Transgenic mice with mutations of corticosteroid receptors are promising tools, which allow us to investigate the role of these proteins in the pathogenesis of symptoms characteristic for depression and anxiety. This review summarizes the neuroendocrinological and behavioral findings that have been obtained in six different mouse strains with specific mutations that influence the expression or the function of the glucocorticoid or the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). The analyses of these mice helped to define molecular concepts of how corticosteroid receptors regulate the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system. Furthermore, some of these mutant mice exhibited characteristic alterations in behavioral tests for anxiety and despair. However, so far, none of the mouse strains described here can be viewed as an animal model of a specific psychiatric disease defined by common diagnostic criteria. Using high throughput technologies for the identification of genes regulated by glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and NM in brain areas responsible for specific symptoms of stress-related disorders will yield potential new drug targets for the treatment of depression and anxiety. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据