4.7 Article

Dependence of halo properties on interaction history, environment, and cosmology

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 557, 期 2, 页码 616-625

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/321631

关键词

cosmology : theory; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : halos; methods : n-body simulations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

I present results from numerical N-body simulations regarding the effect of merging events on the angular momentum distribution of galactic halos, as wen as a comparison of halo growth in Press-Schechter versus N-body methods. A total of six simulations are used, spanning three cosmologies: a standard flat Omega (0) = 1 model, an open Omega (0) = 0.3 model, and a tilted flat Omega (0) = 1 model with spectral index n = 0.8. In each model, one run was conducted using a spatially uniform grid of particles and one using a refined grid in a large void. In all three models and all environments tested, the mean angular momentum of merger remnants (halo interaction products with mass ratios 3:1 or less) is greater than nonmerger remnants. Furthermore, the dispersion in the merger-remnant angular momentum distribution is smaller than the dispersion of the nonmerger distribution. The interpretation most consistent with the data is that the orbital angular momentum of the interactors is important in establishing the final angular momentum of the merger product. I give the angular momentum distribution, which describes the merger remnant population. I trace the, most massive progenitor of L-* galactic-mass halos (uniform grid) and 10(11) Me halos (refined void) from z = 0 back to z = 5. Monte Carlo mass histories match simulations reasonably well for the latter sampled I find that for halos of mass 10(12) less than or similar to M less than or similar to 10(14) M-circle dot, this method can underestimate the mass of progenitors by 20%, hence yielding improper formation redshifts of halos. With this caveat, however, the general shapes of halo mass histories and formation time distributions are preserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据