4.6 Article

Complement is essential for protection by an IgM and an IgG3 monoclonal antibody against experimental, hematogenously disseminated candidiasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 167, 期 3, 页码 1550-1557

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1550

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI44786, P01 AI37194, R01 AI36389, R01 AI24912, R37 AI14209] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of life-threatening, hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, which is predominantly caused by Candida albicans, parallels the use of modern medical procedures that adversely affect the immune system. Limited antifungal drug choices and emergence of drug-resistant C albicans strains indicate the need for novel prevention and therapeutic strategies. We are developing vaccines and Abs that enhance resistance against experimental candidiasis. However, the prevalence of serum anti-Candida Abs in candidiasis patients has led to the misconception that Abs are not protective. To explain the apparent discrepancy between such clinical observations and our work, we compared functional activities of C. albicans-specific protective and nonprotective mAbs. Both kinds of Abs are agglutinins that fix complement and are specific for cell surface mannan, but the protective Abs recognize beta -mannan, and the nonprotective Ab is specific for a-mannan. By several indirect and direct measures, the protective mAbs more efficiently bind complement factor C3 to the yeast cell than do nonprotective Ab. We hypothesize that the C3 deposition causes preferential association of blood-borne fungi with host phagocytic cells that are capable of killing the fungus. We conclude from these results that the protective potential of Abs is dependent on epitope specificity, serum titer, and ability to rapidly and efficiently fix complement to the fungal surface. The mechanism of protection appears to be associated with enhanced phagocytosis and killing of the fungus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据