4.6 Article

Feeding habits of wild and escaped farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in the Northeast Atlantic

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 916-933

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2001.1084

关键词

Atlantic salmon; wild salmon; escaped farmed salmon; feeding; feeding selectivity; diet; Faroes; Norwegian Sea; temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stomach contents of 2992 wild and 863 putative escaped farmed Atlantic salmon caught on floating long-lines in a Faroese research fishery in the late autumn (November-December) and winter (February-March) in the Northeast Atlantic (63-66 degreesN and 1-10 degreesW) during three consecutive fishing periods 1991/1993-1994/1995 were analysed. Hyperiid amphipods of the genus Themisto. euphausiids and mesopelagic shrimps are important sources of food for salmon in the autumn period and various mesopelagic fish as lantern fishes, pearlsides and barracudinas become equally important during the late winter period. The occasional presence in the stomach of larger fish such as herring, blue whiting and mackerel is not considered to be evidence that these fish are a main source of food for salmon in the sea north of the Faroes. The proportion of stomachs containing food was significantly lower during autumn (53%) than during winter (78%). However, temperature-dependent evacuation rates could partly explain the apparent lower stomach content during the autumn since the average ambient sea-surface temperature is 7 degreesC in autumn compared to 3 degreesC in winter. There was evidence of selective foraging. Fish were preferred over crustaceans, and amphipods were chosen over euphausiids. Large salmon (3+SW) tended to be more piscivorous than smaller fish. There was no difference in condition factor, number and weight proportions of prey, or in diet between wild and escaped farmed salmon, which suggests that escaped farmed salmon adapt well to the wild life in the ocean. (C) 2001 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据