4.8 Article

Changes of activity inducing chromosomal aberrations and transformations of chlorinated humic acid

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 2621-2628

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00545-5

关键词

chromosomal aberration test; transformation test; chlorination; disinfection by-products; initiating activity; promoting activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The change of the toxicity of chlorinated water after chlorine injection was examined. For the measurement of toxicity, chromosomal aberration test and transforming test were carried out as indexes to initiating activity and to promoting activity in the carcinogenesis process. respectively. Activity inducing chromosomal aberrations of chlorinated humic acid gradually decreased with time after chlorination. In contrast, activity inducing transformations measured by the two-stage assay gradually increased. Thus, the toxicity that decreases or increases is present in chlorinated water. Furthermore, activity inducing transformations measured by the non-two-stage assay gradually decreased. This direction of change was reverse to that of activity inducing transformations by the two-stage assay and consistent with that of activity inducing chromosomal aberrations. It is speculated that the main reason of decreasing activity inducing transformations by the non-two-stage assay is because initiating activity detected as activity inducing chromosomal aberrations in chlorinated water decreases drastically. Directions of changes of total organic halogen and carbonyl group were qualitatively consistent with that of activity inducing chromosomal aberrations. Directions of changes of chloroform and dichloroacetic acid were qualitatively consistent with that of activity inducing transformations by the two-stage assay. Findings of this study suggest that further research is necessary to compare carcinogenicity of tap water near water purification plant and distant lap water. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据