4.3 Article

Plaque-induced abnormalities in neurite geometry in transgenic models of Alzheimer disease: Implications for neural system disruption

期刊

出版社

AMER ASSN NEUROPATHOLOGISTS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/60.8.753

关键词

Alzheimer disease; modeling; neural networks; senile plaque; transgenic

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG 15453, AG08487] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurites that pass through amyloid-beta deposits in Alzheimer disease (AD) undergo 3 changes: they develop phosphorylated tau immunoreactivity the density of SMI-32-positive dendrites diminishes and they also develop a marked alteration in their geometric features, changing from being nearly straight to being quite curvy. The extent to which the latter 2 phenomena are related to phosphorylated tau is unknown. We have now examined whether amyloid-beta deposits in APP695Sw transgenic mice, which have only rare phosphorylated tau containing neurites. develop these changes. We found that dendritic density is diminished within the boundaries of amyloid-beta plaques, with the greatest loss (about 80%, p < 0.001) within the boundaries of thioflavine S cores. Remaining dendrites within plaques develop substantial morphological alterations quantitatively similar to those seen in AD. A statistically significant but smaller degree of change in geometry was seen in the immediate vicinity around plaques, suggesting a propagation of cytoskeletal disruption from the center of the plaque outward. We examined the possible physiological consequences of this change in dendritic geometry using a standard cable-theory model. We found a predicted delay of several milliseconds in about one quarter of the dendrites passing through a thioflavine S plaque. These results are consistent with previous observations in AD, and suggest that thioflavine S-positive amyloid-beta deposits have a marked effect on dendritic microarchitecture in the cortex, even in the relative absence of phosphorylated tau alterations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据