3.8 Article

Chinese medicinal herbs for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review

期刊

LIVER
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 280-286

出版社

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2001.021004280.x

关键词

Chinese medicinal herbs; chronic hepatitis B; Cochrane; randomised clinical trial; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/Background: Chronic hepatitis B is a serious health problem worldwide. Chinese medicinal herbs are widely used for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China and many clinical trials have been conducted. This systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicinal herbs for chronic hepatitis B. Methods: Randomised clinical trials comparing Chinese medicinal herbs versus placebo, no intervention, nonspecific treatment, or interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis B with greater than or equal to3 months follow-up were included. No language and blinding limitations were applied. The electronic databases were searched, combined with handsearches on Chinese literature. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was assessed by the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Results: Nine randomised trials (n=936) were included, with only one being of high quality. There was a funnel plot asymmetry (intercept 3.37, p=0.047). Compared to nonspecific treatment or placebo, the herbal compound Fuzheng Jiedu Tang showed an effect on clearance of serum HBsAg (relative risk 5.19, 95% CI 1.24-21.79), HBeAg (10.85, 3.56-33.06), and HBV DNA (8.50, 1.23-58.85). Polyporus umbellatus polysaccharide showed an effect on serum HBeAg (3.06, 1.13-8.29) and HBV DNA (4.14, 1.0-17.19); Phyllanthus amarus showed an effect on serum HBeAg (3.35, 7.56). Phyllanthus compound and kurorinone showed no significant difference on clearance of serum HBeAg and HBV DNA and on alanine aminotransferase normalisation compared to interferon. No serious adverse event was observed. Conclusions: Chinese medicinal herbs are not recommended for chronic, hepatitis B because of the publication bias and low quality of the trials. Rigorously designed, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据