4.4 Article

Structural evidence for multiple transport mechanisms through the Golgi in the pancreatic β-cell line, HIT-T15

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 461-467

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0290461

关键词

electron tomography; endoplasmic reticulum; three-dimensional

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR00592, RR01229] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM42629, P01GM61306] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate data on the three-dimensional architecture of the Golgi is prerequisite for evaluating the mechanisms of transit through this organelle. Here we detail the structure of the Golgi ribbon within part of an insulin-secreting cell in three dimensions at similar to6 nm resolution. Rapid freezing, freeze-substitution and electron tomography were employed. The Golgi in this region is composed of seven cisternae. The cis-most element is structurally intermediate between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) and the cis-most cisterna characterized in three dimensions at high resolution in a normal rat kidney cell [Ladinsky, Mastronarde, McIntosh, Howell and Staehelin (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 1135-1149]. There are three transcisternae that demonstrate morphological and functional variation. The membrane surface areas and volumes of these elements decrease from cis to trans. The two trans-most cisternae are dissociated from the stack and are fragmented by tubulation. ER closely adheres to and inserts between individual trans-cisternae. Many of the 2119 small, clathrin-negative vesicles that are in close proximity to the Golgi fill the region where transcisternae have moved out of register with the ribbon. These data provide evidence that cisternal progression/maturation, trafficking via membrane tubules and vesicle-mediated transport act in concert in the same region of the Golgi ribbon, and suggest an important role for the ER in regulating membrane dynamics at the trans-Golgi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据