4.6 Article

Reconstitution of a functional duck hepatitis B virus replication initiation complex from separate reverse transcriptase domains expressed in Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 75, 期 16, 页码 7410-7419

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7410-7419.2001

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis B viruses replicate through reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate, the pregenomic RNA (pgRNA). Replication is initiated de novo and requires formation of a ribonucleoprotein complex comprising the viral reverse transcriptase (P protein), an RNA stem-loop structure (epsilon) on the pgRNA, and cellular proteins, including the heat shock protein Hsp90, the cochaperone p23, and additional, as yet unknown, factors. Functional complexes catalyze the synthesis of a short DNA primer that is templated by e and covalently linked to the terminal protein (TP) domain of P protein. Currently, the only system for generating such complexes in the test tube is in vitro translation of duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) P protein in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL), which also provides the necessary factors. However, its limited translation capacity precludes a closer analysis of the complex. To overcome this restriction we sought to produce larger amounts of DHBV P protein by expression in Escherichia coli, followed by complex reconstitution in RRL. Because previous attempts to generate full-length P protein in bacteria have failed we investigated whether separate expression of the TP and reverse transcriptase-RNase H (RT-RH) domains would allow higher yields and whether these domains could trans complement each other. Indeed, TP and, after minor C-terminal modifications, also RT-RH could be expressed in substantial amounts, and when added to RRL, they were capable of c-dependent DNA primer synthesis, demonstrating posttranslational activation. This reconstitution system should pave the way for a detailed understanding of the unique hepadnaviral replication initiation mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据