4.5 Article

Ricin toxicity to microglial and monocytic cells

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 83-93

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(01)00024-9

关键词

ricin toxicity; microglial; monocytic cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglial cells, like macrophages, are very sensitive to ricin, a galactose-specific toxic lectin belonging to the family of ribosome-inactivating proteins. This toxin can be taken up by most cells through the binding of its B chain to galactose-containing molecules on the cell membrane. In macrophagic cell types it can be internalised also by mannose receptors which are present on the surface of these cells. Endocytosis of the toxin by either pathway was evaluated by ricin toxicity to primary cultures of rat microgial cells and to a microglial N11 cell line in the presence or absence of lactose and mannan, which compete for the endocytosis via the ricin lectin chain or cellular mannose receptors, respectively. Results were compared with those obtained in cultures of mouse macrophages, human monocytes, and a monocytic JM cell line. All cultures were protected from ricin toxicity more by lactose than by mannan, indicating that ricin endocytosis via its lectin B chain is prevalent over that mediated by cellular mannose receptors. However, a partial protection by mannan was observed in all cases but not-stimulated NI I cells, either in the form of direct protection or of significant additional protection over that afforded by lactose. Mannose receptor expression by NI I cells was negative before, and positive after, treatment with endotoxin, as assessed by the specific binding of I-125-mannose-bovine serum albumin. Moreover, a partial protection from ricin toxicity by mannan was induced in the N11 microglial line after stimulation, consistently with an inducible expression of the mannose receptor by activated cells switched towards a microglial phenotype. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据