4.5 Article

Evaluating primary care as a base for medical education: the report of the Cambridge Community-based Clinical Course

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 782-788

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00981.x

关键词

clinical competence; education medical, standards; education, medical, undergraduate; England; family practice, education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Medical students receive increasing amounts of their clinical education in a primary care setting. The educational possibilities of such attachments are still being explored. Aim To report the evaluation of a small, radical innovation to provide students with a long-term community attachment which integrated with hospital-based education. Method Between 1993 and 1998, 13 medical students completed 15-month attachments with a single general practice in England. The course offered them experience in the major clinical specialties throughout this period. Students were exposed to specialist as well as generalist education in the context of patients with whom they could establish a continuing relationship. The innovation was evaluated by its feasibility, by students' examination results, by analysis of clinical experience, through formal student feedback and by cost. Results The course was practicable in a particular setting with academic leadership. The students all passed their exams. They had wide, appropriate clinical experience even though the attachment was to a single practice. When they returned to the hospital environment, students did not feel themselves at a disadvantage compared with traditional students. The costs of the course are controversial: placement costs were higher than in the hospital, but those for facilities were lower. Conclusion It is possible to run a course like this successfully. It remains the most radical attempt to share clinical education in the UK between primary and secondary/tertiary care. Further research is required into providing long-term clinical attachments in NHS primary care settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据