4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 are down-regulated in human mononuclear cells rafter injury

期刊

SURGERY
卷 130, 期 2, 页码 249-255

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2001.115901

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1RO1 DK50201-0] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM08466-06] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Recent characterization of prostaglandin receptor subtypes shows that each is critical to cellular functions and operates through separate signaling pathways that may explain differing effects of prostanoids. This study aimed to determine whether prostaglandin receptors EP2 and EP4 are modulated after injury and to evaluate the effect of prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) addition and blockade on EP receptor expression. Methods. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from 10 patients sustaining fracture or burn injury and 10 control subjects were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide +/- NS-398, an inhibitor of PGE(2) production. Samples were evaluated for production of PGE(2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and leukotriene B-4 as well as mRNA expression of EP receptors and COX-2. EP receptor expression was also evaluated after treating control PBMCs with PGE(2). Results. PBMCs from injured patients exhibited significant increases in PGE(2) production and COX-2 mRNA compared with control subjects, and these increases were inhibited by NS-398. In contrast, EP2 and EP4 receptors were markedly down-regulated after injury and NS-398 restored expression to control levels. Decreased EP2 and EP4 receptor expression after injury was replicated by coincubation of PBMCs with PGE(2). Conclusions. Specific PGE(2) receptors are down-regulated after injury and NS-398 reverses this response. Furthermore, PGE(2) mediates EP2 and EP4 down-regulation. These data suggest that specific EP receptor subtypes may provide critical targets for augmenting the immune response after injury in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据