4.6 Article

Role of serum leptin, insulin, and estrogen levels as potential mediators of the relationship between fat mass and bone mineral density in men versus women

期刊

BONE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 114-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00487-2

关键词

estrogen; human; leptin; obesity; osteoporosis

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR27065] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although fat mass is related to bone mineral density (BMD), the potential mechanism(s) of this effect remain to be defined. Thus, we assessed the role of the candidate hormones, leptin, insulin, and estrogen in mediating fat mass effects on the skeleton. Specifically, we related these hormones and fat mass to BMD at the total hip, mid-lateral spine, and middistal radius in a sample of 137 premenopausal women (age range 21-54 years), 165 postmenopausal women (34-93 years), and 343 men (23-90 years) recruited from the general population. Fat mass and BMD were significantly related in pre- and postmenopausal women at multiple sites, whereas this relationship was only weakly present in men at the total hip. Serum leptin levels were also significantly related to BMD in the women, but not in the men. Insulin was associated with hip BMD in the women, and bioavailable estradiol (E-2) was correlated with BMD at all sites in men and in postmenopausal women. In the women, adjusting for leptin reduced the strength of the association between fat mass and BMD, with further adjustments for insulin or bioavailable E2 having no additional effects. Adjusting for leptin in the men had no consistent effect on the relationship between fat mass and BMD. Collectively, these data suggest that there is a sexual dimorphism in the relationship of fat mass and leptin to BMD, with both being positively associated with BMD in women but not in men. In women, leptin may also mediate at least part of the protective effect of fat mass on the skeleton. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据