4.2 Article

Effect of C1-esterase-inhibitor on capillary leak and inflammatory response syndrome during arterial switch operations in neonates

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2001.24989

关键词

C1-esterase inhibitor; cardiopulmonary bypass; complement; inflammation; inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine if prophylactic administration of Cl-esterase-inhibitor would have a beneficial effect on postoperative weight gain and the inflammatory response in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Design: Randomized, double-blinded study. Setting: University-affiliated heart center. Participants: Twenty-four neonates with transposition of the great arteries. Interventions: In group inhibitor (INH) patients (n = 12), 100 IU/kg of Cl-esterase-inhibitor (Berinert) was given 30 minutes before CPB. In group placebo (P) patients (n = 12), placebo was administered instead. Interleukin (IL)-6, C3a anaphylatoxin, C1 activity, prekallikrein, Hageman factor, D-dimers, and clinical parameters were measured 6 times perioperatively. Measurements and Main Results: All 24 patients had an uneventful clinical course. Mean arterial pressure and pulmonary oxygenation after CPB were superior in group INH patients. The weight gain on postoperative days 1 to 4 was significantly less in group INH patients compared with group P (55 +/- 59 g vs. 340 +/- 121 g, day 1). The concentration of IL-6 (76 +/- 17 pg/mL vs. 262 +/- 95 pg/mL during CPB) was significantly lower in group INH patients compared with group P patients. In contrast, no influence on C3a anaphylatoxin and coagulation factors was found. Conclusion: Prophylactic application of Cl-esterase-inhibitor in neonates undergoing arterial switch operations produces less inflammatory response compared with placebo. This difference may have contributed to improved clinical parameters, including less weight gain postoperatively. Copyright (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据