4.6 Article

Effect of chronic renal failure on the expression and function of rat intestinal P-glycoprotein in drug excretion

期刊

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1607-1614

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/16.8.1607

关键词

chronic renal failure; intestine; P-glycoprotein; rat; rhodamine 123; semi-quantitative RT-PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In chronic renal failure, the renal excretion of certain drugs is dramatically reduced. To determine whether other routes of drug elimination, such as secretion through the intestinal barrier by intestinal P-glycoprotein can be altered, we compared P-glycoprotein activity, P-glycoprotein protein content, and P-glycoprotein mRNA levels in intestine of control and chronic renal failure rats. Methods. Chronic renal failure was surgically induced in rats by partial (7/8) nephrectomy. After 5 weeks, intestinal transport of rhodamine 123, a P-glycoprotein substrate, was carried out using an in vitro model of everted gut sacs. P-glycoprotein protein content was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and P-glycoprotein mRNA expression was evaluated by semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results. A decrease of intestinal rhodamine 123 transport was observed in chronic renal failure rats, pointing to an inhibition of P-glycoprotein activity. Transport was inhibited in both sham-operated rats and rats with chronic renal failure by verapamil and cyclosporin A, but relative inhibition vs baseline was less marked in chronic renal failure than in sham-operated rats. In contrast, no significant differences in levels of P-glycoprotein protein or mRNA were observed between the two groups. Conclusions. Intestinal secretion of rhodamine 123 is mainly mediated by P-glycoprotein. It was reduced in rats with chronic renal failure, reflecting reduced intestinal drug elimination via a decrease, in P-glycoprotein transport activity rather than via protein underexpression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据