4.0 Article

The Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry: Tool for investigating the epidemiology and biology of Diamond-Blackfan anemia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 377-382

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00043426-200108000-00015

关键词

Diamond-Blackfan anemia; registry; epidemiology; cancer predisposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is a heterogeneous genetic disorder characterized by red cell aplasia and congenital anomalies. One of what appears to be multiple DBA genes has been cloned. Affected individuals in the same family may vary dramatically as to the degree of anemia, response to corticosteroids, and the presence of congenital anomalies. The epidemiology of DBA has been gleaned largely from literature reviews. This approach is limited because of the two-fold disadvantage of the reporting bias inherent in the literature and the lack of an active patient database. The Diamond Blackfan Anemia Registry of North America (DBAR) is designed to overcome these disadvantages to study the epidemiology and biology of DBA. The DBAR is a comprehensive database of patients with DBA who are enrolled after informed consent is obtained. Identification of patients is made through outreach to pediatric and adult hematologists and the Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation. The patients and/or their families complete a detailed questionnaire. A review of medical records and telephone interviews are performed to complete and clarify the information provided. To date, 354 patients have been enrolled in the DBAR. Using this database, important epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory observations have been made with regard to the clinical presentation, the inheritance of DBA, the genetics of congenital malformations, the therapeutic outcome, including the efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the recognition of DBA as a cancer predisposition syndrome. In particular, the database is an essential substrate for DBA gene discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据