4.5 Article

Staudinger ligation towards cyclodextrin dimers in aqueous/organic media. Synthesis, conformations and guest-encapsulation ability

期刊

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 774-783

出版社

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.10.73

关键词

calculations; conformations; cyclodextrin; dimer; inclusion; PM3; Staudinger ligation

资金

  1. Marie Curie Initial Training Networks (FP7-People-ITN-2008) [237962]
  2. NCSR Demokritos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-Cyclodextrin (beta-CD) dimers have been prepared using the bioorthogonal Staudinger ligation for the first time. In addition to a known linker, methyl 2-(diphenylphosphanyl) terephthalate, a doubly active linker was specifically developed that enabled connection of two beta-CD units in a single step and in aqueous/organic media, under mild conditions and with good yields. A three-carbon spacer between the beta-CD torus and the azido group was required for facile dimer formation. The products, as studied by NMR spectroscopy, were found to adopt closed conformations by intramolecular self-inclusion. On the other hand, association via intermolecular binding was also observed in aqueous solution, confirmed by DOSY NMR experiments. Despite self-inclusion, the beta-CD cavities were capable of guest encapsulation, as shown by titration experiments: the binding constant with 1-adamantylamine was similar to that of natural beta-CD. Theoretical calculations for isolated molecules (PM3 level of theory) and in the presence of solvent [water, PM3(COSMO)] as well as DFT calculations suggested that the compounds prefer to adopt conformations which bring the phenyl groups either inside the beta-CD cavity (inclusion) or over its narrow side (vicinal). Thus, Staudinger ligation could be the method of choice for linking CDs exhibiting (i) ease of preparation in aqueous media, in short steps, under mild conditions and in good yields, (ii) satisfactory aqueous solubility and independent binding capacity of the cavities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据