4.5 Article

The A-to-Z Trial: Methods and rationale for a single trial investigating combined use of low-molecular-weight heparin with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban and defining the efficacy of early aggressive simvastatin therapy

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 142, 期 2, 页码 211-217

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.116959

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The A-to-Z Trial is an ongoing international, multicenter, randomized study designed to investigate 2 issues concerning contemporary care of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The first issue is whether the use of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin affects outcomes and safety when used as a therapy adjunctive to baseline treatment with tirofiban and aspirin in patients with non-ST-elevation (nSTE) ACS. The second issue is whether early use of an aggressively dosed statin is superior to a current trial-based accepted care regimen of a lower-dose statin started 3 to 6 months after an acute event. Methods The study is conceptually and functionally divided into 2 sequential parts-the A Aggrastat and Z Zocar phases. The primary A-phase end point is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and documented refractory ischemia at 7 days. Both nSTE-ACS patients from the A phase and patients with ST-elevation ACS who meet specific risk criteria are eligible to enter the subsequent Z (Zocor) chronic phase (Z phase). The primary end point of the Z phase is a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, readmission for ACS, and stroke. The trial will continue until 970 primary events have occurred in the Z-phase population. Conclusion This trial is evaluating 2 temporally connected sequences of phamacotherapy For ACS. At completion, trial results will provide definitive evidence regarding efficacy and safety of early, intensive statin therapy and better define the role of low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with nSTE ACS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据