4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Distribution of selenium in a mini-landscape of Yutangba, Enshi, Hubei Province, China

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 11-12, 页码 1333-1344

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00047-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yutangba. where a sudden incidence Se poisoning occurred in 1963, is located in the northern part of Shuanghe Town of Enshi City in the SW of Hubei Province. China. In a small area of 0.01 km(2) in Yutangba, the mean concentrations of Se in soil and corn were. soil, 4.06 +/- 1.24 mug g(-1); total corn, 6.47 +/-4.29 mug g(-1): root, 4.36 +/-3.27 mug g(-1); stalk, 3.06 +/-2.24 mug g(-1); leaf, 9.79 +/-7.62 mug g(-1): and seed. 8.07 +/- 5.02 mug g(-1), the spatial distribution of Se in soil and corn is significantly uneven. Selenium is an active element in the supergene moderate-strong chemical weathering environment. relatively low-Se, median-Se and high-Se subregions can be distinguished according to St: concentrations in soil and corn. Microtopographic features and leaching conditions are the primary factors affecting Se content and distribution in soil and corn. Increased incidence of Se poisoning is likely to occur in the low-Se subregions where Se easily accumulates. Selenium concentrations differ significantly among the organs of corn and decrease in the following order: tassel (male flower), silk (female flower)> leaf > seed > root > stalk > leafy husk of the ear. The Se concentrations in the upper leaves and stalks were greater than in their lower cognates and the outer leafy husk of the ear had a greater Se concentration than the inner leafy husk. This distribution not only indicates that Se is probably an essential element for corn, but also that, under high-Se background and no Se-accumulating indicator plant occurrence. these plant organs with relatively high Se concentrations may be used as a sensitive indicator of Se levels in the environment. :(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据