4.4 Article

Isolation of ovulation-inducing factors in the seminal plasma of bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) by DEAE-cellulose chromatography

期刊

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
卷 36, 期 3-4, 页码 177-181

出版社

BLACKWELL WISSENSCHAFTS-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2001.d01-33.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovulation in the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) depends upon the ovulation-inducing factor in the seminal plasma; however, little research has been conducted to isolate and identify the factor. The current study attempts to isolate and identify the bioactive fractions from the seminal plasma of Bactrian camel. The seminal plasma was fractionated by diethylamino-ethylcellulose (DEAE)-cellulose chromatography and five protein fractions were obtained. The bioactive of each fraction was estimated by rat pituitary tissue culture in vitro and by the intramuscular injection of the bioactive fraction to the female camels in vivo. The concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the pituitary culture media before and 6 h after the addition of each fraction and in the peripheral blood plasma collected from the camel immediately before and hourly after the injection of the active fraction were measured by radioimmunoassay. The results demonstrated that the third fraction (U) had the bioactive potential to stimulate the release of LH in vitro from 11.82 +/- 1.77 to 25.63 +/- 3.84 mIU/ml after the addition of L3 to the culture media. The in vivo concentrations of LH in the blood plasma of the camel increased from 6.43 +/- 0.14 before to 15.50 +/- 2.64 ng/ml 6 h after injection of U. However, the concentrations of FSH did not show any significant changes either in vitro or in vivo. The results clearly demonstrated the existence of LH-releasing associated fractions in the seminal plasma that appears to be separated by DEAE-cellulose matrix and the isolated L3 fraction might be the ovulation-inducing factor or one of its components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据