4.5 Article

Dimerization of a cell-penetrating peptide leads to enhanced cellular uptake and drug delivery

期刊

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 1788-1797

出版社

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.8.204

关键词

anti-tumor agents; cell-penetrating peptides; drug delivery; internalization studies; organometallic complexes; peptides

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [0313909]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 630]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past 20 years, cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) have gained tremendous interest due to their ability to deliver a variety of therapeutically active molecules that would otherwise be unable to cross the cellular membrane due to their size or hydrophilicity. Recently, we reported on the identification of a novel CPP, sC18, which is derived from the C-terminus of the 18 kDa cationic antimicrobial protein. Furthermore, we demonstrated successful application of sC18 for the delivery of functionalized cyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (cymantrene) complexes to tumor cell lines, inducing high cellular toxicity. In order to increase the potential of the organometallic complexes to kill tumor cells, we were looking for a way to enhance cellular uptake. Therefore, we designed a branched dimeric variant of sC18, (sC18)(2), which was shown to have a dramatically improved capacity to internalize into various cell lines, even primary cells, using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Cell viability assays indicated increased cytotoxicity of the dimer presumably caused by membrane leakage; however, this effect turned out to be dependent on the specific cell type. Finally, we could show that conjugation of a functionalized cymantrene with (sC18)(2) leads to significant reduction of its IC50 value in tumor cells compared to the respective sC18 conjugate, proving that dimerization is a useful method to increase the drug-delivery potential of a cell-penetrating peptide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据