4.7 Article

Pharmacological profile of hydroxy fasudil as a selective rho kinase inhibitor on ischemic brain damage

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 1441-1453

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01229-2

关键词

cerebral ischemia; hydroxy fasudil; rho kinase inhibitor; neuroprotection; pharmacokinetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuroprotective property and the effects on hemodynamics of hydroxy fasudil, an active metabolite of an antispastic drug, fasudil, were examined. In rats, hydroxy fasudil was found following intravenous infusion or intraperitoneal administration of fasudil, and the maximum plasma concentration of hydroxy fasudil was approximately 25 or 40% of the parent drug, respectively. The i.v. administration of hydroxy fasudil produced significant increases in regional cerebral blood flow in dogs. Hydroxy fasudil relaxed the KCI, PGF(2 alpha) or U-46619-induced contraction in canine basilar or middle cerebral arterial strips, concentration-dependently. The neuroprotective property of hydroxy fasudil was examined on delayed neuronal death in gerbils. Hydroxy fasudil (3 mg/kg) significantly protected against the ischemia-induced neuronal loss. To further clarify the effect on neurological impairments, hydroxy fasudil was tested in a rat model of microembolization stroke. Intravenous administration of hydroxy fasudil improved neurological functions, significantly reduced the size of the infarct area and prevented the accumulation of neutrophils. The present findings suggest that hydroxy fasudil has an efficacy to improve the hemodynamic function and to inhibit neutrophil-mediated damage, and contributes to the potency and long duration of the cytoprotective properties of fasudil on ischemic brain damage, and also suggest a critical role for rho kinase in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemic injury, and the potential utility of rho kinase inhibitor as a therapeutic agent in stroke. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据