4.7 Article

Differential regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and TIMP-2 expression in co-cultures of prostate cancer and stromal cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 93, 期 4, 页码 507-515

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1358

关键词

matrix metalloproteinase; prostate cancer; stroma; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; fibroblast

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-82298, CA-88028] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-stromal interactions have been suggested to be a critical factor in both tumor invasion and tumor metastasis, Here, we examined the role of tumor-stromal interactions using co-cultures of prostate cancer (PC) cells derived from primary and metastatic tumors with primary or immortalized stromal (fibroblast and smooth muscle) cells and their effect on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) expression. co-cultures of PC and stromal cells showed enhanced levels of pro-MMP-9 and reduced levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, Whereas enhanced expression of pro-MMP-9 occurred in PC cells, the TIMPs were down-regulated in stromal cells, Induction of pro-MMP-9 and reduction of TIMP expression did not require cell-cell contact and were mediated by a soluble factor(s) present in the conditioned medium of the effector cell. Collagen I is a potent inducer of pro-MMP-9 in PC cells. Consistently, preliminary characterization of the soluble factor in the fibroblast conditioned medium revealed m.w. of approximately 100 to 250 kDa, and its effect on pro-MMP-9 expression was partly inhibited by an anti-alpha2 integrin antibody, a major collagen I receptor. Expression of pro-MMP-9 protein and mRNA was also induced in metastatic PC-3 cells grown in human fetal bone implants in SCID mice. Together, these findings demonstrate the importance of tumor-stromal interactions in the regulation of MMP and TIMP expression and their potential role in PC progression. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据