4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Electrochemical noise analysis (ENA) for active and passive systems in chloride media

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 46, 期 24-25, 页码 3651-3664

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00643-0

关键词

mild steel; stainless steel; aluminum alloys; electrochemical noise; electrochemical impedance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical noise data (ECN) have been collected for several active systems (mild steel/NaCl, brass/NaCl, Al 6061/NaCl and Al 2024/NaCl) and a passive system (SS 316L/Ringer's solution). The ECN data have been analyzed in the time and frequency domains. Parameters such as the noise resistance R-n and the skewness and kurtosis of potential and current fluctuations have been determined from the analysis in the time domain. It has been concluded that the localization index (LI) is not related to a particular corrosion mechanism. Comparisons of spectral noise impedance spectra obtained from power spectral density (PSD) plots with traditional impedance spectra have been made. Good agreement has been observed for all systems after trend removal. Comparisons have also been made between R-n and the polarization resistance R-p obtained from analysis of the impedance spectra. It has been observed that R-n generally is a function of the bandwidth Deltaf of the ECNNI. For the passive system SS316L/Ringer's solution R-n was much smaller than R-p. The relationship between potential and current fluctuations has been evaluated. For the two Al alloys random fluctuations occurred, while for mild steel a systematic trend of potential versus current was observed. After trend removal only random fluctuations remained for this system. It is possible to make corrections of the experimental values of standard deviations of the potential (sigmaV) and current (sigmaI) fluctuations as well as R-n assuming linear drift of the potential and current fluctuations. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据