4.3 Article

Decision-making processes: The case of collective movements

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 635-647

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.009

关键词

Consensus; Inter-individual relationships; Leadership; Self-organization; Social status

资金

  1. French Society for the Study of Animal Behaviour
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-07-BLAN-0208]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-07-BLAN-0208] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Besides focusing on the adaptive significance of collective movements, it is crucial to study the mechanisms and dynamics of decision-making processes at the individual level underlying the higher-scale collective movements. It is now commonly admitted that collective decisions emerge from interactions between individuals, but how individual decisions are taken, i.e. how far they are modulated by the behaviour of other group members, is an under-investigated question. Classically, collective movements are viewed as the outcome of one individual's initiation (the leader) for departure, by which all or some of the other group members abide. Individuals assuming leadership have often been considered to hold a specific social status. This hierarchical or centralized control model has been challenged by recent theoretical and experimental findings, suggesting that leadership can be more distributed. Moreover, self-organized processes can account for collective movements in many different species, even in those that are characterized by high cognitive complexity. In this review, we point out that decision-making for moving collectively can be reached by a combination of different rules, i.e. individualized (based on inter-individual differences in physiology, energetic state, social status, etc.) and self-organized (based on simple response) ones for any species, context and group size. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据