4.3 Article

Multiple paternities increase genetic diversity of offspring in Brandt's voles

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 745-749

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.05.002

关键词

Genetic relatedness; Inner Mongolia; Microsatellite markers; Multi-male mating; Population genetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC30671380]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2007CB109100]
  3. China State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents
  4. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mating system and philopatry influence the genetic structure of a social group in mammals. Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii) lives in social groups year-round and has male biased dispersal, which makes the vole a model system for studies of genetic consequences of mating system and philopatry. This study aimed to test the hypotheses that: (1) multiple paternity (MP) would exist in Brandt's voles, enhance offspring genetic diversity and reduce genetic relatedness between littermates; (2) promiscuity would occur in this species in that males and females mate with multiple partners; and (3) plural breeders of a social group would be genetically related because of philopatry of female juveniles in Brandt's voles. Paternity analysis indicated that MP occurred in 11(46%) of 24 social groups examined and that promiscuity existed in this species. Multiple paternity litters had twice the offspring genetic diversity and half the average within-litter genetic relatedness of single paternity litters. We also found plural breeding females in six social groups. Average pairwise genetic relatedness of plural breeders ranged from 0.41 to 0.72 in four social groups, suggesting first-order kinship. Future studies need to investigate effects of reproductive skew and MP on population genetic structure of Brandt's voles. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据