4.8 Article

Maternal energy stores and diet composition during pregnancy program adolescent blood pressure

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 1034-1039

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc3401.095037

关键词

blood pressure; adolescents; pregnancy; nutrition

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD38700] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Fetal undernutrition is hypothesized to program blood pressure (BP) later in life. Human epidemiological studies that use birth weight as a proxy for fetal malnutrition fail to identify specific aspects of maternal nutrition responsible, for programming. Methods, and Results-We examined how maternal nutrition during pregnancy and infant birth weight relate to systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) in 2026 Filipino adolescents. Data were collected prospectively during the Cebu (Philippines) Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey. Women were assessed at approximate to 30 weeks gestation, and children were followed from birth through adolescence. Regression models were used to examine how the mothers' total energy intake, percentage of energy from protein and fat, triceps skinfold thickness during pregnancy, and infant birth weight relate to adolescent BP, controlling for current age, height, and body mass index and other potential confounders. Maternal triceps skinfold thickness was significantly inversely related to SBP among boys and to DBP in boys and girls. Maternal nutrition variables attenuated but did not eliminate an inverse birth weight-SBP relationship in boys. SBP was significantly inversely related to the mothers' percent of dietary energy from protein in boys. Among girls, SBP and DBP were inversely related to the mothers' percentage of calories from fat. There was no evidence of confounding of these relationships by current diet, maturation status, physical activity, or socioeconomic status. Conclusions-Maternal diet composition and energy stores in the form of subcutaneous fat have long-term effects on offspring BP in adolescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据