4.7 Article

Preparation and evaluation of molecularly imprinted polymeric microspheres by aqueous suspension polymerization for use as a high-performance liquid chromatography stationary phase

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 442, 期 1, 页码 105-111

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01115-1

关键词

molecularly imprinted polymer; microsphere; aqueous suspension polymerization; chromatographic stationary phase; 4-aminopyridine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecularly imprinted polymeric microspheres (MIPMs) were prepared using 4-aminopyridine as imprinting molecule by aqueous suspension polymerization. The MIPMs were packed into stainless steel column (250 mm. x 4.6 mm i.d.) for selective separation and quantitative determination of 4-aminopyridine and 2-aminopyridine. The influence of mobile phases adjusted with different pH buffers (acetate solution) on capacity factors were investigated. The results showed that the capacity factor (k ') for 4-aminopyridine increased with increasing pH of mobile phase while that of 2-aminopyridine was subtly changed. The studies showed that the capacity factors for substrates were affected by both of MIPM stationary phase and mobile phase. In low pH (pH less than or equal to 5.5) mobile phase, the 4-aminopyridine was eluted prior to 2-aminopyridine and its capacity factor (k ') was lower. In high pH (pH > 5.5) mobile phase, however, the capacity factor (k ') for template molecule exhibited far higher than that of non-imprinting molecule. Therefore, the imprinted microspheres against 4-aminopyridine were used to separate and simultaneous determinate 4-aminopyridine and 2-aminopyridine. The responses of peak areas versus concentrations of substrates present good linearity with R > 0.999. This method may be used to separate and simultaneous determinate multicomponental homologous compounds or isomers, which are very expensive or unavailable or whose physicochemical properties are very similar, by changing the pH of mobile phases. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据