4.7 Article

Transgenic expression of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase modifies the transition from hypertrophy to early heart failure

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 422-429

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh1701.095522

关键词

hypertrophy; heart failure; contractile function; mouse myocytes; sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-52946, HL-38189] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine the contribution of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a) to early heart failure, we subjected transgenic (TG) mice expressing SERCA2a gene and wild-type (WT) mice to aortic stenosis (AS) for 7 weeks. At an early stage of hypertrophy (4-week AS), in vivo hemodynamic and echocardiographic indices were similar in TG and WT mice. By 7 weeks of AS, which is the stage of early failure in this model, TG mice with AS had lower mortality than WT mice with AS (6.7% versus 29%). The magnitude of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy was similar in WT and TG 7-week AS mice. In vivo LV systolic function was higher in TG than in WT 7-week AS mice. In LV myocytes loaded with fluo-3, fractional cell shortening and the amplitude of the [Ca2+](i) transients were higher in TG than in WT 7-week AS mice under baseline conditions (0.5 Hz, 1.5 mmol/L [Ca2+](o), 25 degreesC). The rates of relengthening and decay in [Ca2+](i) were faster in TG than in WT 7-week AS myocytes. In myocytes from WT 7-week AS compared with sham-operated WT mice, contractile reserve in response to rapid pacing was depressed with impaired augmentation of both peak-systolic [Ca2+](i) and the SR Ca2+ load. In contrast, contractile reserve and the capacity to augment SR Ca2+ load were maintained in TG 7-week AS mice. SERCA2a protein levels were depressed in WT 7-week AS mice, but were preserved in TG 7-week AS mice. These data suggest that defective SR Ca2+ loading contributes to the onset of contractile failure in animals with chronic pressure overload.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据