4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Identification of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 532-537

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6328

关键词

ovarian cancer; prognostic factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has demonstrated that age, tumor grade, and size and number of residual lesions after primary cytoreductive surgery are significant prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Recent studies have reported numerous other clinical features as having prognostic value. We sought to identify the independent prognostic factors for survival in a cohort of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma who received their primary treatment at our institution between 1987 and 1994. Results. A total of 295 patients were identified, 282 of whom were evaluable. Of these 282 patients, 214 (76%) have died of disease or other causes. The median follow-up is 32 months (range: 1-139). Eighteen factors were evaluated for prognostic significance. Significant factors in univariate analysis included patient age, gravidity (0 vs > 0), parity (0 vs > 0), preoperative albumin level, preoperative total protein level, ascites (presence vs absence), disease stage (IIIA/IIIB vs IIIC vs IV), number of residual lesions (less than or equal to 20 vs >20), and diameter of largest residual tumor nodule (less than or equal to1 cm vs 1-2 cm vs >2 cm). However, on multivariate analysis, only patient age (P<0.001), ascites (P=0.001), and size of residual disease (P=0.005) retained prognostic significance. Substage of disease was of borderline significance (P=0.086). Conclusion. Although numerous clinical variables have recently been reported to have prognostic value in advanced ovarian carcinoma, only patient age, presence or absence of ascites, and diameter of the largest residual tumor nodule proved to be of statistical significance in our analysis. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据