4.0 Article

Lack of cocaine-like discriminative-stimulus effects of σ-receptor agonists in rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 22, 期 5-6, 页码 525-530

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328349ab22

关键词

sigma receptor; 1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine; cocaine; discriminative-stimulus effects; dopamine-uptake inhibitor; methylphenidate; PRE-084; WIN 35 428

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of selective sigma-receptor (sigma R) agonists [1,3-di-o-tolylguanidine (DTG), PRE-084] as reinforcers in rats trained to self-administer cocaine. Similar to cocaine, these drugs increased nucleus accumbens shell dopamine levels, and effects of DTG, but not PRE-084, on dopamine seemed to be mediated by sigma Rs. In addition, sigma R antagonists blocked self-administration of sigma R agonists, but were inactive against reinforcing and neurochemical effects of cocaine. Thus, pharmacologically distinct mechanisms likely underlie the reinforcing and neurochemical effects of sigma R agonists and cocaine. This study further examined the cocaine-like effects of sigma R agonists in rats trained to discriminate injections of cocaine from saline to assess the similarity of their subjective effects. Standard dopamine-uptake inhibitors (WIN 35 428, methylphenidate), but neither sigma R agonist (PRE-084, DTG), produced full cocaine-like discriminative-stimulus effects. The lack of effects of sigma R agonists was obtained regardless of route of administration (intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, or intravenous) or pretreatment time (5 or 30 min before sessions). The present results demonstrate differences in the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and selective sigma R agonists, indicating that an overlap of subjective effects is not necessary for sigma R agonist self-administration. The previously found differences in neurochemical effects of cocaine and sigma R agonists may contribute to their different subjective effects. Behavioural Pharmacology 22:525-530 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据