4.6 Article

Parental occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields and radiation and the incidence of neuroblastoma in offspring

期刊

EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 508-517

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200109000-00008

关键词

neuroblastoma; occupation; electromagnetic fields; radiation; radiofrequency; childhood cancer; job exposure matrix; parental exposures

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA30969, CA57004, CA13539] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32-ES-07018] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined parental occupational exposures to electromagnetic fields and radiation and the incidence of neuroblastoma in offspring. Cases were 538 children diagnosed with neuroblastoma between 1992 and 1994 in the United States or Canada. Age-matched controls were selected by random-digit dialing. Occupational exposures to electrical equipment and radiation sources were classified by an industrial hygienist, and average exposures to extremely, low frequency magnetic fields were estimated using a job exposure matrix. Maternal exposure to a broad grouping of sources that produce radiofrequency radiation was associated with an increased incidence of neuroblastoma (odds ratio = 2.8; 95% confidence interval = 0.9-8.7). Paternal exposure to battery-powered forklifts was positively associated with neuroblastoma (odds ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.8-3.2), as were some types of equipment that emit radiofrequency radiation (odds ratios congruent to 2.0); however, the broad groupings of sources that produce ELF fields, radiofrequency radiation, or ionizing radiation were not associated with neuroblastoma. Paternal average extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure > 0.4 microTesla was weakly associated with neuroblastoma (odds ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.9-2.8), whereas maternal exposure was nor. Overall, there was scant supportive evidence of strong associations between parental exposures in electromagnetic spectrum and neuroblastoma in offspring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据