4.6 Article

Systemic anti-inflammatory mediators in COPD: increase in soluble interleukin 1 receptor II during treatment of exacerbations

期刊

THORAX
卷 56, 期 9, 页码 721-726

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.721

关键词

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; systemic inflammation; soluble interleukin 1 receptor II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the chronic inflammatory process present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is due to a defective endogenous antiinflammatory mechanism. Methods-Systemic levels of the antiinflammatory mediators soluble interleukin 1 receptor II (sIL-1RII), soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor p55 (sTNF-R55) and sTNF-R75, and of C reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (CRP) were analysed in 55 patients with stable COPD (median forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 34%6 predicted (range 15-78)) and compared with levels in 23 control subjects. In addition, changes in these mediators were studied in 13 patients with COPD (median FEV1 34% predicted (range 19-51)) during the first 7 days in hospital with an exacerbation of the disease. Results-Patients with stable COPD were characterised by a systemic inflammatory process indicated by an increased leucocyte count (7.2 (4.7-16.4) nu 4.8 (3.5-8.3) x 10(9)/1), raised levels of CRP (11.8 (1.1-75.0) nu 4.1 (0.6-75.0) mug/ml) and LBP (45.6 (8.1-200.0) nu 27.9 (14.1-71.5) mug/ml), and moderate increases in both sTNF-Rs. In contrast, the sIL-1RII level did not differ between patients and controls (4.53 (2.09-7.60) nu 4.63 (3.80-5.93) ng/ml). During treatment of disease exacerbations, systemic levels of both CRP (at day 3) and LBP (at day 7) were significantly reduced compared with day 1, whereas sIL-1RII levels increased. Conclusions-These data suggest an imbalance in systemic levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in patients with stable COPD. The increase in the and-inflammatory mediator sIL-1RII during treatment of exacerbations may contribute to the clinical improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据