4.0 Article

Binding characteristics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with relation to emission tomography studies

期刊

SYNAPSE
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 203-211

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/syn.1076

关键词

[H-3]-(+)-McN5652; [H-3]-(S)-citalopram; SSRI; rat brain; temperature; logP; receptor binding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When developing ligands for emission tomography studies, one of the major obstacles lies in the selection of ligand candidates. A previously unattended factor such as the influence of temperature on candidate ligand affinity is likely to play a role. By use of rat brain homogenates, the binding characteristics of [H-3]-(S)-citalopram and [H-3]-(+)-McN5652 and the receptor-ligand interaction at the serotonin transporter of 17 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared at 21 degreesC and 37 degreesC, respectively. Ligand logP values were also calculated. The ratios for K-i at 37 degreesC vs. 21 degreesC varied between 0.2 and 2.2 for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors considered in this study, with most of the ligands displaying an inverse relationship between K-i and temperature. Ten of the 17 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found to have pK(i) values statistically significantly different at 21 degreesC compared to 37 degreesC (P < 0.05). The logP values ranged between 3.6 and 4.8, except for DASB, 5-iodo-6-nitroquipazine, and paroxetine where logP was 1.9, 2.2, and 5.0, respectively. K-d was 0.71 nM at 37C and 0.31 nM at 21 degreesC for [H-3]-(S)-citalopram. For [H-3]-(+)-McN5652 K-d was 0.11 nM at 37 degreesC and 0.08 nM at 21 degreesC. The association and dissociation was much faster for [H-3]-(S)-citalopram as compared to [H-3]-(+)-McN5652. It is concluded that temperature may affect K-d differently and that in vitro dissociation may help to predict whether a given ligand may be useful in PET studies. LogP values do not per se predict the potential of a given ligand as an emission tomography tracer. Synapse 41: 203-211,2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据