4.1 Article

Biodegradability, cellular compatibility and cell infiltration of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) in comparison with poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide)

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0883911515569006

关键词

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate); poly(epsilon-caprolactone); poly(lactide-co-glycolide); biodegradability; cellular compatibility

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB725204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51073081, 51173084, J1103503]
  3. PCSIRT [IRT13023]
  4. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [13JCYBJC24900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate), poly(epsilon-caprolactone), and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) films were prepared by solution casting and electrospinning. The degradability of cast films was evaluated in vitro and in vivo by recording the weight remaining, observing the morphology, and measuring change in molecular weight and M-w/M-n polydispersity. In addition, cell proliferation on electrospun films was tested by MTT assay, and cell infiltration into electrospun films was assessed through subcutaneous implantation in rats. By analyzing data obtained from these tests, we discovered that the degradation rates of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) copolymers were between those of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and poly(1actide-co-glycolide) and could be controlled by adjusting 4-hydroxybutyrate content. Moreover, tissue responses to materials made from poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) were milder compared with those elicited by poly (epsilon-caprolactone) and poly(1actide-co-glycolide), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) films exhibited a good and moderate cell infiltration. Therefore, our data demonstrate that poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) copolymers are promising candidates for the construction of scaffolds designed for various types of tissue regeneration with special biodegradability requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据