4.6 Article

Neural correlates of a Go/NoGo task with alcohol stimuli in light and heavy young drinkers

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 382-389

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.039

关键词

Go/NoGo; Alcohol; Dorsolateral prefrontal; fMRI; Response inhibition

资金

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [AA017996]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA024772, DA023368, DA024659]
  3. National Cancer Institute [CA152062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibitory processes are highly relevant to behavioral control affecting decisions made daily. The Go/NoGo task is a common task used to tap basic inhibitory processes important in higher order executive functioning. The present study assessed neural correlates of response inhibition during performance of a Go/NoGo task in which NoGo signals or tests of inhibitory control consisted of images of beer bottles. Group comparisons were conducted between 21 heavy and 20 light drinkers, ranging in age from 18 to 22. Behaviorally, overall performance assessed with d-prime was significantly better among the lighter drinkers. On a neural level, the heavy drinkers showed significantly greater activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex and cingulate relative to the light drinkers during the NoGo trials. These regions are implicated in reflective or control processing of information. Further, heavy drinkers showed significantly greater activity in the insula relative to light drinkers during NoGo trials, a neural region implicated in habit circuitry and tied to cue induced urges and emotional memories of physical effects of drugs. These results suggest that the heavier drinkers may have experienced increased working memory demand and control efforts to withhold a response due to poorer inhibitory control from enhanced salience of alcohol cues on the beer NoGo trials, which also engaged insula mediated effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据