4.6 Article

Determination of serum cystatin C: Biological variation and reference values

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 850-857

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2001.141

关键词

cystatin C; biological variation; reference values

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human cystatin C is a low molecular weight protein which has been proposed as a better marker of glomerular filtration rate than creatinine. To be able to interpret results obtained in different patient populations it is necessary to define cystatin C reference values. We measured serum concentration of cystatin C in 1223 subjects using a particle-enhanced nephelometric assay. Subjects were aged 4 to 79 years and were selected among apparently healthy individuals who came to the Centre for Preventive Medicine in Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France. We observed a Gaussian distribution of cystatin C concentration in serum. We did not find any effect of age or gender in children, hormonal status in women (puberty, menopause, oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy) or alcohol intake. Cystatin C concentration was slightly lower in female than in male adults below the age of 60 years. Cystatin C levels significantly increased above the age of 60 in both males and females, probably due to physiological aging of renal function. No other significant differences were observed between males and females. Using multiple regression analysis, moderate correlations were observed between body mass index and cystatin C, and between smoking and cystatin C, but these were not biologically significant. According to the literature, only methylprednisolone and cyclosporin A increased and decreased cystatin C levels, respectively. The reference values for cystatin C obtained in a carefully selected population were 0.75 +/- 0.089 mg/l for children aged 4-19 years, 0.74 +/- 0.100 mg/l for males and 0.65 +/- 0.085 mg/l for females (aged 20-59 years), and 0.83 +/- 0.103 mg/l for older individuals (greater than or equal to 60 years).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据