4.6 Article

Role of insular cortex D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in nicotine self-administration in rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 273-278

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.005

关键词

Insular cortex; Dopamine; D-1; D-2; Nicotine; Self-administration

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [DA027840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The insular cortex has been associated with the processing of rewarding stimuli and with the neural bases of drug addiction. Ischemic damage to the insula has been associated with decreased desire to smoke cigarettes. Which component of insular function is involved in the neural basis of cigarette smoking is not clear. Dopamine systems are crucial for the reinforcing value of addictive drugs. The DA projection from the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) has been shown to be a vital pathway for the primary reinforcement caused by taking a variety of abused drugs. In the current set of studies, the roles of D-1 and D-2 receptors in the insular cortex in the self-administration of nicotine by rats were assessed. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were fitted with jugular catheters and given access to self-administer nicotine. Bilateral local infusion cannulae were implanted into the agranular insular cortex to locally administer D-1 and D-2 antagonists (SCH-23390 and haloperidol). Acute local infusions of the D-1 antagonist SCH-23390 into the insula (1-2 mu g/side) significantly decreased nicotine self-administration by more than 50%. Repeated infusions of SCH-23390 into the agranular insula caused continuing decreases in nicotine self-administration without signs of tolerance. In contrast, local infusions of the D-2 antagonist haloperidol 0.5-2 mu g/side did not have any discernable effect on nicotine self-administration. These studies show the importance of DA D-1 systems in the insula for nicotine reward. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据