4.6 Article

Effects of cholecystokinin-8 on morphine-induced spatial reference memory impairment in mice

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 346-353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.033

关键词

Cholecystokinin octapeptide; Morphine dependency; Spatial reference memory; Morris water maze; Spine density; CA1

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81273337, 81172900]
  2. Training funds for Talent Project in Hebei Province
  3. Applied Basic Research Key Program of Hebei Province [10966911D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute and chronic exposure to opiate drugs impaired various types of memory processes. To date, there is no preventive treatment for opiate-induced memory impairment and the related mechanism is still unclear. CCK-8 is the most potent endogenous anti-opioid peptide and has been shown to exert memory-enhancing effect, but the effect of CCK-8 on morphine-induced memory impairment has not been reported. By using Morris water maze, we found that escape latency to the hidden platform in navigation test was not influenced, but performance in the probe test was seriously poor in morphine dependency mice. Amnesia induced by chronic morphine treatment was significantly alleviated by pre-treatment with CCK-8 (0.01, 0.1 and 1 mu g, i.c.v.), and CCK-8 (0.1 and 1 mu g, i.c.v.) treatment alone could improve performance in either navigation or probe test. Furthermore, Golgi-Cox staining analysis revealed that pre-treatment with CCK-8 (1 mu g, i.c.v.) reversed spine density decreased in CA1 region of hippocampus in morphine dependency mice, and CCK-8 (1 mu g, i.c.v.) alone obviously increased spine density in CA1. Our findings conclude spine density change in CA1 region of hippocampus may be the structural plasticity mechanism which is responsible for enhancing effect of CCK-8 on spatial reference memory. Therefore, CCK-8 could effectively improve memory impairment in morphine dependency mice. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据