4.6 Article

Electric-field-induced migration of oxygen ions in epitaxial metallic oxide films:: Non-Debye relaxation and 1/f noise -: art. no. 104304

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 64, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.104304

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the. kinetics of current-induced change of resistance and conductivity noise in thin epitaxial metallic films of LaNiO3. The resistance of the film changes at a very low current (threshold current density J(th)similar to 10(3) A/cm(2)). We find that the time dependence associated with the change of resistance shows a stretched-exponential-type dependence at lower temperature. Above a certain temperature scale T* (approximate to 350 K), this crosses over to a creep-type behavior. At T similar toT*, the time scale shows a drastic drop in the magnitude, and a long-range diffusion sets in, which leads to an increase in the conductivity noise. The phenomenon is like a glass-transition in the random lattice. of oxygen ions. We observe that the stretched exponential relaxation function, as obtained from time dependence of resistivity change, can explain the spectral structure as well as the temperature dependence of the low-frequency conductivity noise. The frequency and temperature dependence of noise could clearly identify the various processes, which had been seen in the current-stressing experiments carried out in the time domain. This establishes a quantitative link between the dynamics of current-induced resistivity changes and the conductivity noise. Both the phenomena are direct consequences of the low-frequency dynamics associated with the migration of the oxygen ions. Though done in the specific context of oxide films (used in oxide electronics), this observation has a generic aspect, and the treatments developed here can be used for establishing a quantitative link between electromigration current stressing and the conductivity noise in other metallic interconnects as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据