4.6 Article

One-trial object recognition memory in the domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is disrupted by NMDA receptor antagonists

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 62-73

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.049

关键词

Object recognition memory; Habituation; Sensitization; Scent marking; Rabbit; Short term memory

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), Mexico [129381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spontaneous response to novelty is the basis of one-trial object recognition tests for the study of object recognition memory (ORM) in rodents. We describe an object recognition task for the rabbit, based on its natural tendency to scent-mark (chin) novel objects. The object recognition task comprised a 15 min sample phase in which the rabbit was placed into an open field arena containing two similar objects, then removed for a 5-360 min delay, and then returned to the same arena that contained one object similar to the original ones (Familiar) and one that differed from the original ones (Novel), for a 15 min test phase. Chin-marks directed at each of the objects were registered. Some animals received injections (sc) of saline, ketamine (1 mg/kg), or MK-801 (37 mu g/kg), 5 or 20 min before the sample phase. We found that chinning decreased across the sample phase, and that this response showed stimulus specificity, a defining characteristic of habituation: in the test phase, chinning directed at the Novel, but not Familiar, object was increased. Chinning directed preferentially at the novel object, which we interpret as novelty-induced sensitization and the behavioral correlate of ORM, was promoted by tactile/visual and spatial novelty. ORM deficits were induced by pre-treatment with MK-801 and, to a lesser extent, ketamine. Novel object discrimination was not observed after delays longer than 5 min. These results suggest that short-term habituation and sensitization, not long-term memory, underlie novel object discrimination in this test paradigm. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据