4.7 Article

Coronary vasa vasorum neovascularization precedes epicardial endothelial dysfunction in experimental hypercholesterolemia

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 762-766

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00347-9

关键词

angiogenesis; atherosclerosis; cholesterol; coronary disease; endothelial function

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 11800] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 63911] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Experimental hypercholesterolemia is associated with vasa vasorum neovascularization, unknown to occur before or after initial lesion formation. Thus, this study was performed to determine the temporal course of neovascularization of coronary vasa vasorum in relation to endothelial dysfunction, a hallmark of early atherosclerosis. Methods: Female domestic pigs were fed a normal diet (Group 1), a hypercholesterolemic diet for 2 and 4 weeks (Group 2), or a hypercholesterolemic diet for 6 and 12 weeks (Group 3). In vitro analysis of relaxation response to bradykinin served as an index for epicardial endothelial function. Spatial pattern and density of coronary vasa vasorum were assessed by three-dimensional microscopic computed tomography. Results: Relaxation response of coronary arteries to bradykinin was normal in both Group 1 (93 +/-6%) and Group 2 (89 +/-7%) but impaired in Group 3 (71 +/- 11%; P <0.05 vs. Group 1 and 2). In contrast, density of coronary vasa vasorum was significantly higher in both Group 2 (4.88 +/-2.45 per-mm(2)) and Group 3 (4.50 +/-1.37 per-mm(2)) compared to Group 1 (2.97 +/-1.37 per-mm(2); P <0.05 vs. Group 2 and 3). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that coronary vasa vasorum neovascularization occurs within the first weeks of experimental hypercholesterolemia and prior to the development of endothelial dysfunction of the host vessel, suggesting a role for vasa vasorum neovascularization in the initial stage of atherosclerotic vascular disease. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据