4.3 Article

Preclinical evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of PK2: A novel HPMA copolymer-doxorubicin-galactosamine conjugate antitumour agent

期刊

HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 461-470

出版社

ARNOLD, HODDER HEADLINE PLC
DOI: 10.1191/096032701682693017

关键词

PK2; cardiotoxicity; HPMA copolymers; polymer therapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PK2 is a polymeric anticancer conjugate composed of an N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer backbone and pendant doxorubicin (DOX) linked via a Gly-Phe-Leu-Gly peptide spacer. Additionally galactose residues are present to facilitate liver targeting. To justify clinical evaluation of PK2 it was necessary to determine its late cardiotoxicity compared to that of free DOX. A well standardised Sprague-Dawley rat model was used with either intravenous (IV) administration (4, 8 and 12 mg/kg DOX equivalent) or intraperitoneal (IP) administration (12, 18, 24 and 36 mg/kg DOX equivalent) of PK2. This variation in the route was due to the limited solubility of PK2 at higher doses. PK2 showed two to three times less acute toxicity (assessed by the maximum reduction in body weight in the first 2 weeks) than free DOX, and both compounds were less toxic when given IR No animals given PK2 IV showed clinical signs of cardiotoxicity, the only toxicity seen was abnormal tooth growth (similar to 50% of the animals receiving 12 mg/kg, DOX equivalent). In contrast, several animals receiving free DOX (1-4 mg/kg) IV died due to cardiotoxicity in an approximately dose-related manner. All animals receiving free DOX (4 mg/kg) died by 12 weeks. Following IP administration of PK2 there were only two late deaths related to cardiotoxicity and these were in the 24 mg/kg DOX equivalent group. All animals receiving PK2 at the highest dose (36 mg/kg DOX equivalent) died within 4 weeks, cardiotoxicity was not the main contributing factor. In this study, PK2 displayed a similar to5-fold reduction in cardiotoxicity relative to free DOX and this supported the progression of PK2 into early clinical investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据