4.6 Article

Diversity of grip in adults and young humans and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 218, 期 1, 页码 21-28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.021

关键词

Grasping; Precision grip; Hand preference; Power grip; Age effect; Pan troglodytes; Chimpanzee; Primates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grasping is essential for primates in numerous behaviors. A variety of different grasping techniques are used for obtaining food. Among humans, several studies have shown that the properties of the objects such as the size or the form influence grasp patterns. In addition, other works have tested the individual variability through grasping strategies and age and several studies have revealed some similarities between great apes and humans in grip types. Finally, results on hand preference are still equivocal and, for non-human primates, object parameters and age effect are rarely tested together, even though it is a methodological aspect important to consider. The study sought to determine whether grip type varied according to the age of the subject, the species (human versus chimpanzee), the size of the object and the hand used. Frame-by-frame analysis of hand contact strategies and statistical results indicated that (1) adults of both species used fewer contact strategies than juveniles and that there was a greater variability of contacts for small than for large objects (2) young juvenile chimpanzees and human children follow a similar grip types development, i.e. more frequent use of precision grips with age (3) juvenile chimpanzees used all five categories of grip and the adults used the thumb-fingerpad(s) more than the precision grips in addition to the power grip and (4) a right hand preference was greater for the grasping of small objects with precision grips in adults for both species. These results are discussed in relationship with neurology, morphology and grasping evolution. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据