4.6 Article

Effects of the cognition impairer MK-801 on learning and memory in mice and rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 220, 期 1, 页码 215-229

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.01.052

关键词

Animal model; T-maze alternation; Morris task; Object recognition; Social recognition; Passive avoidance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a great need for relevant animal models for investigating the effects of putative pro-cognitive compounds. Compounds that impair learning and/or memory processes without inducing adverse side effects are cognition impairers. Rats and mice with cognitive deficits induced by the prototypical N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 may provide a relevant animal model based on the mechanistic approach of blocking NMDA/glutamatergic signaling. Unfortunately, the dose range over which MK-801 induces cognitive impairment without causing sensory, locomotor, or toxicological side effects is small. We provide an overview of the effects of MK-801 in different cognitive tasks and assessed whether MK-801 reliably affects the cognitive performance of mice or rats in the spatial Morris task, T-maze alternation tasks, and non-spatial passive avoidance, social, and object recognition tasks. MK-801 disrupted or retarded memory acquisition in all tasks. The Morris task, once acquired, was insensitive to MK-801 at a dose up to 0.1 mg kg(-1) body weight. Retention deficits in the passive avoidance tests were not likely to be due to MK-801-induced changes in shock sensitivity, as measured by a shock threshold test. On the basis of published evidence and the present findings, we conclude that MK-801, administered s.c. or i.p. into rodents in doses up to 0.1 mg kg(-1), appears to fulfill the criteria of our definition of a cognition impairer in rodents, without causing sensorimotor impairments and/or signs of intoxication. In addition. MK-801-treated rodents appear to fulfill the criteria of a valid animal model of cognitive dysfunctions, with robust effects across species, housing conditions, and testing paradigms. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据