4.6 Article

Effects of ventral tegmental area stimulation on the acquisition and long-term retention of active avoidance learning

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 225, 期 2, 页码 515-521

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.014

关键词

Intracranial self-stimulation; Brain stimulation reward; Dopaminergic treatment; Avoidance learning; Acquisition; Long term retention; Shuttle-box

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [SFB 779, SFB-TRR-62]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of avoidance learning depends on dopamine release in forebrain regions. Previous studies indicated that rewarding brain stimulation facilitated two-way active avoidance learning. However, it is not clear whether the temporal relationship of brain stimulation to the training session (before, during or after) is important. To investigate the role of stimulation condition (no stimulation, self-stimulation only, or self-stimulation plus avoidance stimulation) and sequence of self-stimulation training (before or after avoidance training), we used a 3 x 2 factorial design, in which every level of stimulation was paired with every level of sequence for a total of 6 different groups. The results suggest that self-stimulation either before or after avoidance learning improved acquisition performance, but acquisition was maximal when stimulation was also given during acquisition trials. Importantly, the sequence of self-stimulation (before or after each acquisition session) was irrelevant to this beneficial effect. However, stimulation had no apparent effect on long-term retention when tested 10 days later under conditions of no stimulation, except that the performance of the group that had previously received avoidance-contingent stimulation deteriorated over the course of 60 trials. This may reflect frustration from the omission of expected reward. These results are relevant for optimizing brain stimulation to improve learning. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据