4.6 Article

Non-effective increase of fMRI-activation for motor performance in elder individuals

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 223, 期 2, 页码 280-286

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.040

关键词

Age; Motor compensation; Motor recruitment

资金

  1. University of Greifswald
  2. DFG [LO 795/7-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motor performance declines with increasing age and it has been proposed that elder people might compensate for these deficits with increased cerebral activation. However, it is not known, whether increased activation - especially in motor areas of the contralateral and the ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere - might effectively contribute to motor performance or whether it is an ineffective way to counteract age related deficits in the motor system. We tested this question by mapping brain activation during performance of differentially demanding motor tasks in 18 young (mean 25.39 years) and 17 elderly (mean 66.65 years) healthy individuals. We tested a wide range of hand motor tasks from passive wrist movements, fist clenching at different frequencies, to a somatosensory-guided finger pinch task. In the elderly group functional activation was generally increased for all tasks with comparable motor performance for ipsilateral primary and secondary motor areas. The young group showed increased contralateral primary motor cortex activation for the more difficult somatosensory guided precision grip task. We correlated motor performance of the task with high difficulty and comparable performance with fMRI-activation. Elder participants showed a negative correlation for the ipsilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) and for the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex (SM1). Young participants showed a positive correlation for contralateral SMA and SM1. Our data suggest an increased cerebral recruitment reflects an inefficient response to an age-related higher difficulty of task and is not an effective way to counteract age-related deficits in the motor system. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据