4.5 Article

Encapsulation and stabilization of nerve growth factor into poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid microspheres

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 90, 期 9, 页码 1356-1365

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.1088

关键词

nerve growth factor; microspheres; microencapsulation; sustained-release; poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid; PLGA; zinc acetate; zinc carbonate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of a stable sustained-release formulation of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) for the treatment of neuronal diseases is described. The protein was encapsulated into poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres using a spray freeze drying technique. Liquid nitrogen and cold ethanol were used to spray-freeze-dry solid rhNGF that had been suspended in a solution of PLGA dissolved in ethyl acetate. When excipients such as sugar (trehalose), surfactant (pluronic F68), and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) were added to the PLGA formulation to protect rhbNGF from degradation during spray freeze drying, the protein degraded via aggregation during in vitro release. The formation of an insoluble rhNGF-zinc complex prior to encapsulation into PLGA microspheres stabilized the protein during both microencapsulation and release. In this study, we have demonstrated that the addition of zinc acetate in a 1:12 rhNGF-to-zinc acetate molar ratio in a solid rhNGF formulation (4 nim sodium bicarbonate at pH 7.4) improves stability of rhNGF during release at 37 degreesC (physiological temperature). The stabilization may be due to rhNGF complexation with zinc to form stable aggregates. The PLGA formulation consisting of 10% rhNGF encapsulated in 12 kDa PLGA (50:50 lactide/glycolide) provided a continuous release of 14 days. The low initial burst (similar to1%) and controlled-release rate were achieved by the addition of 3 or 6% solid zinc carbonate to the polymer phase during microencapsulation. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据