4.8 Article

Effector differentiation is not prerequisite for generation of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 871-878

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI13296

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-56949, R01 HL054936, P01 HL056949, HL-54936] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-5911, AI-46566, R01 AI045406, AI-45025, R01 AI046566, R21 AI046566, R01 AI045025, AI-45406] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lineage relationship between short-lived effector T cells and long-lived memory cells is not fully understood. We have described T-GFP mice previously, in which naive and early activated T cells express GFP uniformly, whereas cells that have differentiated into effector cytotoxic T cells selectively lose GFP expression. Here we studied antigen-specific CD8 T cell differentiation using T GFP mice crossed to the TCR transgenic (Tg) mice P14 (specific for the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein peptide, gp33-41). After activation with antigenic peptide, P14XT-GFP CD8(+) T cells cultured in high-dose IL-2 developed into cells with effector phenotype and function: they were blastoid, lost GFP expression, expressed high levels of activation and effector markers, and were capable of immediate cytotoxic function. In contrast, cells cultured in IL-15 or low-dose IL-2 never developed into full-fledged effector cells. Rather, they resembled memory cells: they were smaller, were GFP(+), did not express effector markers, and were incapable of immediate cytotoxicity. However, they mediated rapid-recall responses in vitro. After adoptive transfer, they survived in vivo for at least 10 weeks and mounted a secondary immune response after antigen rechallenge that was as potent as endogenously generated memory cells. In addition to providing a simple means to generate memory cells in virtually unlimited numbers, our results suggest that effector differentiation is not a prerequisite for memory cell generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据